Myths About Embryonic Stem Cell Research:
Length: 987 words (3.6 pages)
Rating: Red (FREE)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Myths About Embryonic Stem Cell Research
Myth: "Human life begins in the womb, not the Petri dish"
Reality: Actually, it usually begins in the fallopian tube, but it can also begin in a Petri dish.
The testimony of modern science is clear on this point: "At the moment the sperm cell of the human male meets the ovum of the female and the union results in a fertilized ovum (zygote), a new life has begun."
Considine, Douglas (ed.). Van Nostrand's Scientific Encyclopedia. 5th edition. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1976, p. 943. See Moore, Keith L. Essentials of Human Embryology. Toronto: B.C. Decker Inc, 1988, p.2; Dox, Ida G. et al. The Harper Collins Illustrated Medical Dictionary. New York: Harper Perennial, 1993, p. 146; Sadler, T.W. Langman's Medical Embryology. 7th edition. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins 1995, p. 3; Carlson, Bruce M. Patten's Foundations of Embryology. 6th edition. New York: McGraw_Hill, 1996, p. 3.
The issue is not whether human life is present, but how society ought to treat it.
Even President Clinton's bioethics advisors said: "We believe most would agree that human embryos deserve respect as a form of human life..."
- National Bioethics Advisory Commission on stem cell research, September 1999 (emphasis added)
"Stem cell research" refers to research using stem cells that come from embryos or other sources, such as adult tissue, placentas, or umbilical cord blood. The only way to obtain embryonic stem cells, however, is to kill the living human embryo. The embryos killed for their stems cells are about a week old and have grown to about 200 cells.
Embryonic stem cells have not helped a single human patient, while adult stem cells and similar ethically acceptable alternatives have helped hundreds of thousands.
Myth: "Excess embryos are going to be discarded anyway"
Reality: Not necessarily. Today, parents can preserve "excess" embryos for future pregnancies as well as donate them to other couples. Under proposed NIH guidelines, parents will be asked to consider having them destroyed for federally-funded research instead.
In a recent study, 59% of parents who initially planned to discard their embryos after three years later changed their minds, choosing another pregnancy or donation to infertile couples. New England Journal of Medicine, July 5, 2001.
With the NIH guidelines, these embryos might have already been destroyed.
What's more, we now know that the scientists calling for federal funds have themselves moved on to creating human embryos solely to destroy them for stem cells. So much for the "discarded anyway" argument.
But what scientists or parents might do with the embryos is not the issue. The issue is:
Should the government use taxpayers' money for research which requires destroying human embryos?
No Administration of either party has ever done so.
We believe such unethical research shouldn't be done at all. But if anyone does so, it must be at their expense and on their conscience - not that of the American taxpayers.
Embryonic stem cells have not helped a single human patient. By contrast, adult stem cells and other ethically acceptable alternatives have helped hundreds of thousands of patients, and new clinical uses expand almost weekly.
"A clear majority of Americans supports stem cell research"
Of course they do - but what type of stem cell research do they support?
"Stem cell research" refers to research using various types of stem cells. Stem cells that come from adult tissue, placentas, or umbilical cord blood can be retrieved without harming the donor. The only way to obtain embryonic stem cells, however, is to kill the living human embryo.
Typically, poll questions do not make this distinction.
When Americans are asked if the government should fund stem cell research which requires destroying human embryos, 70% of Americans say "NO."
And when choosing between funding stem cell research including embryonic stem cells vs. stem cell research without embryonic stem cells, Americans support the latter approach 67% to 18%. (International Communications Research, June 8, 2001. See http://www.usccb.org/comm/archives/2001/01-101.htm.)
Throughout American history, no Administration of either party has funded research which relies on destroying live human embryos.
Embryonic stem cells have not helped a single human patient or demonstrated any therapeutic benefit. By contrast, adult stem cells and other ethically acceptable alternatives have helped hundreds of thousands of patients, and new clinical uses expand almost weekly.
Myth: "Embryonic stem cells are the most effective for treating disease"
Reality: Actually, they're not. Embryonic stem cells have not helped a single human patient or demonstrated any therapeutic benefit. By contrast, adult stem cells and other ethically acceptable alternatives have already helped hundreds of thousands of patients, and new clinical uses expand almost weekly. Consider:
Juvenile diabetes
Adult Pancreatic Islet Cells
15 people with serious Type I (juvenile) diabetes became "insulin free" after adult pancreatic islet cell transplants; 9 still need no insulin injections.
- American Diabetes Assoc. Report, June 24, 2001
Embryonic Stem Cells
No person has benefitted.
Spinal cord injury
Adult Immune-System Cells
A young woman rendered paraplegic by a car accident can move her toes and legs after injection of her own immune-system cells into her severed spinal cord.
- Toronto Globe and Mail, June 15, 2001
Embryonic Stem Cells
No person has benefitted...
Immune deficiency
Adult Bone Marrow Stem Cells
2 children born without immune systems ("bubble boy" syndrome) have left their sterile environment and lead normal lives after bone marrow stem cell treatment.
- Science, The Washington Post, April 28, 2000
Embryonic Stem Cells
No person has benefitted...
Corneal repair
Adult Corneal Stem Cells
Several legally blind people can now see more clearly after their corneas were reconstructed with corneal stem cells.
- New England Journal of Medicine, July 13, 2000
Embryonic Stem Cells
No person has benefitted...
Search for: [limited company] [american households] [three little] [good death]
|
Important Note: If you'd like to save a copy of the
paper on your computer, you can COPY and PASTE it into your word
processor. Please, follow these steps to do that in Windows:
1. Select the text of the paper with the mouse and press Ctrl+C. Azete.com (the "Web Site") is produced by the "Company". The contents of this Web Site, such as text, graphics, images, audio, video and all other material ("Material"), are protected by copyright under both United States and foreign laws. The Company makes no representations about the accuracy, reliability, completeness, or timeliness of the Material or about the results to be obtained from using the Material. You expressly agree that any use of the Material is entirely at your own risk. Most of the Material on the Web Site is provided and maintained by third parties. This third party Material may not be screened by the Company prior to its inclusion on the Web Site. You expressly agree that the Company is not liable or responsible for any defamatory, offensive, or illegal conduct of other subscribers or third parties. The Materials are provided on an as-is basis without warranty express or implied. The Company and its suppliers and affiliates disclaim all warranties, including the warranty of non-infringement of proprietary or third party rights, and the warranty of fitness for a particular purpose. The Company and its suppliers make no warranties as to the accuracy, reliability, completeness, or timeliness of the material, services, text, graphics and links. For a complete statement of the Terms of Service, please see our website. By obtaining these materials you agree to abide by the terms herein, by our Terms of Service as posted on the website and any and all alterations, revisions and amendments thereto. |
ntury was the magnetic compass. Another was a portable device used by sailors to help them find their way, which is called an astrolabe. The astrolabe helped determine latitude. Which was very important in navigation. One was invented in the twelfth century and it was the magnetic compass. Maps beca... company in the United States. It focuses on multiple therapeutic modalities like areas of oncology. Amgen investigates proteins specifically natural proteins, peptides, and antibodies. They also work on small molecules. Most of Amgen?s research is target driven. There are many steps they take to f... Normalerweise spiele ich mit meinen Freunden nach schule. Ich auch spiele am Sonnstag. Wenn es Regnen ist spiele ich im Sportzentrum aber man muss zwei pfund bezahlen. Um gut zu sein, muss man sehr viel trainieren. Mein Lieblingsbasketballspieler ist Aaron Owens. Er ist in der be...n? to them when they speak, others think of it as showing gratitude for doing them favors. But lets really define what respect really means. ?Showing acknowledgement for some ones superiority in a certain field? is a quote from a famous philosopher. And to be honest, I?ll show respect to someone th...